<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Futures &#8211; The Science of Vaticination</title>
	<atom:link href="http://knowledgefutures.wordpress.com/2006/10/15/futures-the-science-of-vaticination/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://knowledgefutures.wordpress.com/2006/10/15/futures-the-science-of-vaticination/</link>
	<description>Exploring Knowledge Management and Strategic Foresight</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 07:31:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: a thousand tomorrows &#187; Blog Archive &#187; vaticination</title>
		<link>http://knowledgefutures.wordpress.com/2006/10/15/futures-the-science-of-vaticination/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[a thousand tomorrows &#187; Blog Archive &#187; vaticination]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 11:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://knowledgefutures.wordpress.com/2006/10/15/futures-the-science-of-vaticination/#comment-57</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] In this context, a fascinating post on Knowledge Futures recently, points to the term &#8216;vaticination&#8216; as used in a book by remote viewer Joseph McMoneagle. According to the blog, McMoneagle foresees that the future will see the development of a science of futures studies. “The scientists who specialise in it will be called ‘vaticinationists.’ Their primary concern will centre on the evaluation of the impact of current-day conceptualising and how it might affect the future. The science will not gain sufficient prominence or have a broad effect on world decisions until after 2028. By then, it will be apparent that changes in one aspect of social behaviour have decisive effects on unrelated fields of endeavour.” [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In this context, a fascinating post on Knowledge Futures recently, points to the term &#8216;vaticination&#8216; as used in a book by remote viewer Joseph McMoneagle. According to the blog, McMoneagle foresees that the future will see the development of a science of futures studies. “The scientists who specialise in it will be called ‘vaticinationists.’ Their primary concern will centre on the evaluation of the impact of current-day conceptualising and how it might affect the future. The science will not gain sufficient prominence or have a broad effect on world decisions until after 2028. By then, it will be apparent that changes in one aspect of social behaviour have decisive effects on unrelated fields of endeavour.” [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
